Hibbert PD, Molloy CJ, Schultz TJ, Carson-Stevens A, Braithwaite J. Comparing rates of adverse events detected in incident reporting and the Global Trigger Tool: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2023;35(3). Tilgjengelig fra: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzad056
Eggenschwiler LC, Rutjes AWS, Musy SN, Ausserhofer D, Nielen NM, Schwendimann R, et al. Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0273800. Tilgjengelig fra: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273800&type=printable
Deilkås ET, Haugen M, Risberg MB, Narbuvold H, Flesland Ø, Nylén U, et al. Longitudinal rates of hospital adverse events that contributed to death in Norway and Sweden from 2013 to 2018. Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management. 2021;26(4):153–60. Tilgjengelig fra: https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211026125
Mevik K, Hansen TE, Deilkås EC, Ringdal AM, Vonen B. Is a modified Global Trigger Tool method using automatic trigger identification valid when measuring adverse events? Int J Qual Health Care. 2019;31(7):535–40.
Mevik K, Griffin FA, Hansen TE, Deilkås ECT, Vonen B. Is inter-rater reliability of Global Trigger Tool results altered when members of the review team are replaced? Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(4):492–6. Tilgjengelig fra: http://intqhc.oupjournals.org/
Haukland EC, von Plessen C, Nieder C, Vonen B. Adverse events in hospitalised cancer patients: a comparison to a general hospital population. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(9):1218–23.
Deilkas ET, Bukholm G, Lindstrom JC, Haugen M. Monitoring adverse events in Norwegian hospitals from 2010 to 2013. BMJ open. 2015;5(12):e008576. Tilgjengelig fra: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26719311
Bjertnæs ØA, Deilkås ECT, Skudal KE, Iversen HH, Bjerkan AM. The association between patient-reported incidents in hospitals and estimated rates of patient harm. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015;27(1):26–30. Tilgjengelig fra: http://intqhc.oupjournals.org/
The Norwegian patient safety campaign secretariat. Sluttrapport for pasientsikkerhetskampanjen I trygge hender 24-7 2011–2013,. 2014.Oslo: The Norwegian Knowledge Center. Tilgjengelig fra: http://www.pasientsikkerhetsprogrammet.no/no/I+trygge+hender/L%C3%A6r+om+programmet/_attachment/2925?_ts=146d6eb36d2
Unbeck M, Schildmeijer K, Henriksson P, Jürgensen U, Muren O, Nilsson L, et al. Is detection of adverse events affected by record review methodology? an evaluation of the “Harvard Medical Practice Study” method and the “Global Trigger Tool”. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):10. Tilgjengelig fra: https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-7-10 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3637606/pdf/1754-9493-7-10.pdf
R. Levinson IGD. Adverse events in Hospitals: National incidence among Medicare beneficiaries. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General; 2010.
Sharek PJ, Parry G, Goldmann D, Bones K, Hackbarth A, Resar R, et al. Performance Characteristics of a Methodology to Quantify Adverse Events over Time in Hospitalized Patients. Health Serv Res. 2011;46(2):654–78. Tilgjengelig fra: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01156.x
Resar RK, Rozich JD, Classen D. Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2003;12 Suppl 2:39-45.
National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) Index for Categorizing Er rors. Tilgjengelig på: http://www.nccmerp.org/medErrorCatIndex.html.